This should be fun..

After all these discussions on great movies I figured I'd talk aobut a bad movie, a really bad movie. I like zombie films, there fun to watch and they don't require much effort or thoughts to enjoy or make, but a few actually hold powerful metaphors about human life. Such films are George A Romero's classic's Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead, and Day of the Dead. Unfortunatly these movies were profittable enough to spawn a sequel that in no way even supports the events of the past films. The horid film is of course Day of the Dead 2: Contagium. This film was so bad that the only thoughts that went through my mind were "suicide is a viable option"and "I cant move!". Not only do zombies not appear throughout most of the film, but the main characters who are infected develope a mental link with each other, and manage to impregnate a young girl so effectivley that in 5 days she gives birth. Literally in one scene she appears normal, and as son as they enter a room suddenly shes massive pregnant. Am I the only one who thinks someone screwed up in the continutiy department? This movie is one big trainwreck right fro mthe start. It starts in the 50s with a Russian voice heard talking about how he defected. Then the military is called in and starts killing everyone. A scientist manages to take a vial and leave. Now lets think about his thought process shall we? "Oh my god theres an infectious diseas that raises the dead... I should try to sneak it out!". So he gets shot and the vial falls where it is picked up in 2005 by a work crew from the local mental institution (aka the writers). Now to begin deriding the movies effects we must look at this scene. A 2d computer genated helicopter flys across the screen. Oh god here we go! Then the army begins to fire on the horde of mindless undead, but theres something wrong. There are no muzzle flashes. A closeup of a gun reveals the barrel to not even be hollow. O wait it gets worse. Now normally in a movie (an the real world) when you shoot someone the blood spatters come out of the persons head. This movie is so cheap that a man of stage throws the fake blood AT the dead zombie. So fast foreward to 2005, a group of crazy peopel find the vial and think its treasure and when they open it a bright light appears, and that night little while flying dots fly over their heads. ????????? Excuse me???So then they begin to roam around and try to eat, but begin throwing up orange and black goo. You think in a mental institution someone would notice right? Nope. So it is eventually revealed that the original infected crave human flesh and once they taste it become zombies, who talk and give long eloquent speeches!!! How did i manage to get through this movie? To sum things up the infection spreads and the world becomes infected thus beginning the events of the first film, but wait isn't their a problem? the prequel is set in 2005, and the original film, night of the living dead was in 1968. Again score one for the continutiy guys. Basically this movie is the worse sequel and worst movie I have ever seen. It makes Jaws the Revenge look like an achievement in film making. The makers of this film must have saw Forrest Gump and thought "Wow lets make an entire cast of the mentally retarted and turn them into zombies!! Because the public lovescharacters that have problems" You idiots. You mindless bafoons. The writers directors producers and actors should be black listed and never again allowed to work in film again. To end this review I will qote a good movie "The horror, The horror". Day of the Dead gets 1 out of 100.